Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation 'Translate'. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader. Line 1, position 9083.
MINNEAPOLIS -- Seven weeks into the NFL lockout, players have an early triumph over the owners in court.
U.S. District Judge Susan Richard Nelson ordered an immediate end to the lockout Monday, siding with the players in their bitter fight with the owners over how to divide the $9 billion business.
The fate of the 2011 season remained in limbo: The NFL responded by filing a notice of appeal questioning whether Nelson exceeded her jurisdiction, seeking relief from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis.
U.S. District Judge Susan Richard Nelson ordered an end to the NFL lockout Monday. Read the ruling here. Report (PDF)
What will happen in the next few days is murky, too.
Players may very well show up at team facilities on Tuesday; whether they'll be allowed access is unclear.
DeMaurice Smith, the head of the NFLPA, said on ESPN2 on "NFL Live" that they planned to give players "guidance" about what to do moving forward and said players were eager to resume court-ordered mediation to resolve the pending litigation.
"My hope is really is that there's somebody on the other side who loves football as much as our players and fans do," he said.
Vikings linebacker Ben Leber, who will be a free agent, wasn't sure what would happen Tuesday.
"It sounds like there's a possibility that there might be a door open for us, no pun intended, to go in," he said. "But I really think that it's in the best interest of the players because this is such a sensitive time to stay back and let the dust settle."
Nelson's ruling was a stern rebuke of the NFL's case, hardly a surprise given the court's history with the league and her pattern of questioning during a hearing here three weeks ago in St. Paul, Minn.
In a room packed with lawyers, players and league officials, Nelson politely but persistently questioned NFL lawyer David Boies about his repeated argument that she shouldn't have jurisdiction over a labor dispute with an unfair negotiation charge against the players pending with the National Labor Relations Board.
“They better act quickly, because as of right now there's no stay and, presumably, players could sign with teams. There are no guidelines as of right now, so they have to put something in place quickly.
” -- Jim Quinn, attorney for the players, on NFL's next move
In her ruling, Nelson rejected that contention. She recognized the NFL Players Association's decision to "de-unionize" as legitimate because it has "serious consequences" for the players.
Nelson even referenced her colleague, U.S. District Judge David Doty, who has frequently ruled for the players in the past. Not only did she declare that players are likely to suffer harm by the lockout, a legal requirement for granting the injunction, Nelson wrote that they're already feeling the hurt now.
She cited their short careers, arguing that monetary damages wouldn't be enough relief.
What Nelson didn't do on Monday, however, was tackle the issue of the antitrust lawsuit filed last month when the union broke up. That, she wrote, "must wait another day."
If the injunction is upheld, the NFL must resume business in some fashion.
It could invoke the 2010 rules for free agency, meaning players would need six seasons of service before becoming unrestricted free agents when their contracts expire; previously, it was four years. The requirement for restricted free agents would be four years rather than the three years before 2010. There also was no salary cap in 2010, meaning teams could spend as much -- or as little -- as they wanted.
And the NFL would need to determine whether offseason workouts can be held while the appeal is pending.
What does Nelson's ruling mean? ESPN.com's NFL Nation bloggers weigh in on the potential league-wide ramifications. Blog
• ESPN Radio: Mortensen 
| Brandt
Owners imposed the lockout after talks broke down March 11 and the players disbanded their union. A group of players filed the injunction request along with a class-action antitrust lawsuit against the league.
Jim Quinn, an attorney for the players, said the pressure is on the league.
"They better act quickly, because as of right now there's no stay and, presumably, players could sign with teams," Quinn said. "There are no guidelines as of right now, so they have to put something in place quickly."
In a statement, the NFL again argued its belief that "federal law bars injunctions in labor disputes" and expressed confidence the appeals court would agree.
"But we also believe that this dispute will inevitably end with a collective bargaining agreement, which would be in the best interests of players, clubs and fans. We can reach a fair agreement only if we continue negotiations toward that goal," the NFL said.
Nelson heard arguments on the injunction at a hearing on April 6 and ordered the two sides to resume mediation while she was considering her decision. The owners and players, who failed to reach consensus after 16 days of mediated talks earlier this year, met over four days with a federal magistrate but did not announce any progress on solving the impasse.
“” -- Cardinals kicker Jay Feely
The players have said all along, 'The law is on our side.' Judge Nelson's ruling reaffirms our contention.
They are not scheduled to meet again until May 16, four days after Doty holds a hearing on whether players should get damages in their related fight with owners over some $4 billion in broadcast revenue.
Osi Umenyiora, the New York Giants defensive end and one of the plaintiffs, called the ruling a "win for the players and for the fans" in a statement.
"The lockout is bad for everyone, and players will continue to fight it," Umenyiora said. "We hope that this will bring us one step closer to playing the game we love."
New York Jets guard Brandon Moore called it a good day for the players, but recognized "there's still some legal wrangling that needs to go on."
"This has been frustrating," Moore said. "You're working out on your own, trying to set up drills, trying to find a field somewhere, trying to find a time to get together. I mean, we're professional athletes here. We shouldn't be going through this. On the same token, these were the only cards we were left with."
With appeals expected, the fight seems likely to drag on through the spring and, possibly, into the summer. The closer it gets to August, when training camps and the preseason get into full swing, the more likely it becomes that regular season games could be lost.
That's when fans will really start to sweat this, and the public interest in this case did not go overlooked in Nelson's ruling.
"This particular employment dispute is far from a purely private argument over compensation," she wrote.
Still, kicker Jay Feely, Arizona's player rep before the NFLPA dissolved, was vociferous in reacting to the decision.
"The players have said all along, 'The law is on our side.' Judge Nelson's ruling reaffirms our contention," Feely said.
Information from The Associated Press contributed to this report.
{ 0 comments... read them below or add one }
Post a Comment